Posts: 46
Threads: 10
Joined:
Reputation:
0
Which is more important when choosing a ready-made betting platform—saving time or flexibility in customization?
Posts: 49
Threads: 11
Joined:
Reputation:
0
For me, it was critical to get to market as quickly as possible. That’s why I chose a turnkey platform. Sure, I had to deal with limited customization, but I launched in just a couple of months.
Posts: 135
Threads: 22
Joined:
Reputation:
0
A friend of mine built a platform from scratch. It took almost a year and required a substantial budget. But he ended up with the perfect solution tailored to his business processes. So, if you have a lot of time, in-house development might be justified.
Posts: 141
Threads: 34
Joined:
Reputation:
0
When I was just starting, I wasn’t ready to invest in a long development cycle, so I picked a ready-made solution. I had to accept some compromises, but we launched without huge investments and tested the idea on the market.
Posts: 3
Threads: 0
Joined:
Reputation:
0
Flexibility in configuration is important to me.
Posts: 3
Threads: 0
Joined:
Reputation:
0
For me, saving time was more important, as I needed to launch quickly.
Posts: 2
Threads: 0
Joined:
Reputation:
0
Time savings matter more for quick launch, while customization flexibility is key for long-term scaling.
Posts: 2
Threads: 0
Joined:
Reputation:
0
Зависит от этапов:
Начало: важна экономия времени – быстрый запуск готового оборудования с базовым функционалом.
Масштабирование: ключевая возможность гибкости – кастомизация правил, бонусов и рекомендаций под растущие производители.
Идеал – платформа, которая дает и то, и другое: шаблоны для быстрого старта + инструменты для более глубокой настройки позже.
Ready-made or custom?
![[-]](https://forum.gamblingtalk.net/images/collapse.png "[-]")